1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Tags: , ,

Microsoft Windows Insanities

Windows is a necessary evil. Until recently, I was using Windows 98. However, repeatedly it used to crash and cause a lot of heartburn. Repeatedly I had to get my hard drive formatted and loss of productivity. I had enough so planned to shift to Windows XP. Windows XP was talked about a lot when it was launched. The shading effects et al remained all as eye candy. I believe that most of the core of Windows NT was carried over to Windows XP. This was designed to give it stability. Yet my experiences were far from satisfactory here.

The first boot itself, it crashed. Mercifully, there was a tech support person around me who could appreciate the pains to migrate to a new platform. It was with much deliberation that I could have it running. The first thing that struck me was a drop down in the performance with all the bells and whistles loaded. My applications froze or refused to boot up. Configuring the dial up connection was a nightmare. It was more troublesome then BSNL customer support! I guess one can understand and sympathize with me as to what experience it could have been.

Finally, after a lot of trial and error I could make it. The dial up worked mercifully and so did the applications. I turned off the eye candy and switched on the basic interface. It was much better after that. The troubles did not end with getting online. I tried to get online without the firewall installed. I would have been online for around half an hour when the Internet Explorer got cranked up in multiple windows.

There it was. It should have been some kind of a spy ware or a Trojan horse. Microsoft tends to attract them like flies after rotten corpses! I know it is a very crude example, but then this is what I feel about Microsoft anyway.

The next day, I ran through the installation of ZoneAlarm, which is an excellent firewall. It restored sanity to some extent. MacAfee updated its virus definitions in the mean time and my system is quite safe at the moment.

Microsoft realized much before anyone did. It pays to monopolize the desktops. Partly through buyouts or alliances with the original equipment manufacturers, it ruled over the desktops. I remember the days when Intel ran its advertisements about MMX being the in thing. That it would run the graphical applications like a breeze. Much of it was hogwash. To my surprise and disbelief, they discontinued the support to the chips that they got in the market. Microsoft did the same for Windows 98 recently and announced its plans to stop support for Windows 2000. If some one invested a huge amount of money in getting the same, it is clearly a rip off.

Central to the strategy of Microsoft has always been the idea that governments can always be bought and sold. If the current hoopla around outsourcing would not have been there, Microsoft may not have even looked at India. I wonder how many “smart” people are up there who could point India on the world map. Perhaps that is why they need their Encarta for! Microsoft realized that it could bankroll its deployment of software, especially in the government departments. This way they would be big-ticket spenders as well as depend on the support structure forever.

At times I wonder that why does Windows seem to attract so many vulnerabilities. They made a huge song and dance sequence about the Service Pack 2. Within days of installation, there were several issues with the same. Now it has been claimed that service pack 3 is in the offering to remedy the faults in service pack 2! Further trends are a cause for concern. Microsoft has announced its intention to launch anti virus solutions including spy ware software. Initially it is going to be free. However, they intend to move towards a revenue sharing model, which would ensure increased profits. In short, it can be summarized about the business plan. First, ensure your monopoly by any means. Then design a product that clearly SUCKS. After that, make money to ensure security.

True that people talk of user friendliness. The same thing can be worked out for other Operating systems. Apple Macintosh is a world-beater. However, it seems like that they have hired a bunch of mental retards to market their products. I sincerely wish that they were not bogged down in the marketing fiascos that were the trademark of any stunning product. Surprisingly they did not screw up in iPods.

Microsoft needs to be booted out just the way it crashes our sanity. Can Linux challenge that? Only time would tell.

This post was submitted by Dr. Abhishek Puri on the Techwhack Blogs.



Related Posts

Adobe updates Flash player to version 9

Microsoft to update Windows Update

Windows XP SP3 now being pushed to users

Microsoft aims to fix things with Windows 7

Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 coming out on April 29

4 Comments to “Microsoft Windows Insanities”

  1. Anonymous | February 14th, 2005 at 02:00 pm

    First, you have to use the original versions of any OP that you install. Second, you have to upgrade your base system’s configuration every now and then. You can expect to ‘improve productivity’ by running Windows 98 on a Pentium 2. I use an IBM P3 laptop and I’ve been using Windows 98 for 5 years now without any problems.

    Anyone can comment how bad Microsoft is, but what you don’t get is that the other Operating Systems out there are not as effective as Windows and that with the number of users Microsoft has for its OS, there is no doubt that there will be virus and hacking problems.

    You think hackers would leave MAC alone if it had 95% of the market share. Get real man, and stop the Windows bashing as it’s becoming ‘hip’ there days. Open source will be a pain if it has the majority market share simply because writing and spreading viruses for such OSs will be easier than anything before.

    - Microsoft supporter!

  2. cjp | February 23rd, 2005 at 06:04 pm

    I disagree that writing a virus for open source software would be easier. It’s worth noting that Linux and unix is used in many mission-critical systems, an attractive target you would think, and yet there has never been a serious virus for either.

    The fact that the code is open can speed the time to patch a vulnerability. There are clear and obvious problems in Windows XP SP2, yet we will have to wait for SP3 before they are remedied. Why? Because it would be bad publicity to release another service pack so soon. Better to let the customers suffer a little more than lose face.

    My Linux system is automatically updated far more often than my Windows 2000 box ever was, but I guess this is partly because my Linux system has far more useful software than my Windows system had.

    The reason Windows is so vulnerable is because some monumentally bad design decisions were taken in it’s infancy -both with the Win9x and WinNT/Win2k kernels. It’s feet were bound at birth, now it can’t walk. Go figure.

    Personally, If I installed and OS that, within hours of being exposed to the Internet as-is (and remember Windows doesn’t exactly discourage you from doing this!), had a Trojan installed -potentially giving access to my system to others. Well, I’d ask for a refund. It’s like buying a car without a lock!

    I had that very problem the first time I installed Windows 2000, I quickly sought a replacement. The fact that Microsoft is still suffering the same problems fours years later doesn’t exactly fill me with confidence in buying their future products!

    ~ Linux supporter!

  3. zzzzzzzzz | June 15th, 2005 at 03:30 pm

    Damn uzz guys

  4. Kevin | July 31st, 2005 at 08:28 pm

    Any body would go Mad, when he/she has paid a handsome amount for a product like MS Windows and it gets crank in an hour of surfing over internet. However; it is necessary to mention that internet access with out a firewall and proper virus protection, is a clear cut invitation to get sue your self. It is an end users issue and no were it relates to any operating system. I agree to comments (Comment by Anonymous â?? 14th Feb 2005 @ 02:00 pm) about the security issues with MS when it is used most by desktop users.

    Let me say you all one thing if you really want to be safe, better change your online habits no just blame Microsoft

Leave a Comment