<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Powered by BLOG:CMS? No Way&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress</link>
	<description>Software News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:12:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SQL Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-264108</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-264108</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if there is another language or set of commands beside SQL for talking with databases? 

I&#039;m working on a project and am doing some research thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if there is another language or set of commands beside SQL for talking with databases? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on a project and am doing some research thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xander Mol</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-69253</link>
		<dc:creator>Xander Mol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-69253</guid>
		<description>I totally recognize everything said here. I have been a Blog:CMS user for a ling time, I have started with Nucleus, moved to Nucleus XE and via that to Blog:CMS.

I originally moved from Nucleus to Blog:CMS because of the handy integration of many pre-configured plugins. However, I became more and more annoyed that Radek continued to add features I did not need but that did make my life more difficult while upgrading to the newest version for security reasons.
A long time I have accepted these quirks (and ignored the patronizing behaviour of Radek on his support forum), but the update of Blog:CMS 4.2 caused that many issues with my weblog that I really got fed up with Blog:CMS being a one-person operation. Also see this forum thread: http://forum.blogcms.com/viewtopic.php?id=2241&amp;p=2

So I finally went back to Nucleus and find out that luckily the database structure is still almost the same, so after comparing the two SQL table structures (mind you, the Blog:CMS documentation is outdated here, 4.2 has a slightly different database structure than its documentation shows) and with some work in MySQL in deleting table columns Radek has added that Nucleus does not have, I was able to completely migrate my weblog to Nucleus.
Also, the Nucleus plugin community is that active that I managed to include almost all of the features that Nucleus Core is lacking compared to Blog:CMS again with minimal effort and on top of that included some really helpful plugins that Blog:CMS lacks.

So my advice to all Blog:CMS users still left is indeed to migrate asap to Nucleus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally recognize everything said here. I have been a Blog:CMS user for a ling time, I have started with Nucleus, moved to Nucleus XE and via that to Blog:CMS.</p>
<p>I originally moved from Nucleus to Blog:CMS because of the handy integration of many pre-configured plugins. However, I became more and more annoyed that Radek continued to add features I did not need but that did make my life more difficult while upgrading to the newest version for security reasons.<br />
A long time I have accepted these quirks (and ignored the patronizing behaviour of Radek on his support forum), but the update of Blog:CMS 4.2 caused that many issues with my weblog that I really got fed up with Blog:CMS being a one-person operation. Also see this forum thread: <a href="http://forum.blogcms.com/viewtopic.php?id=2241&amp;p=2" rel="nofollow">http://forum.blogcms.com/viewtopic.php?id=2241&amp;p=2</a></p>
<p>So I finally went back to Nucleus and find out that luckily the database structure is still almost the same, so after comparing the two SQL table structures (mind you, the Blog:CMS documentation is outdated here, 4.2 has a slightly different database structure than its documentation shows) and with some work in MySQL in deleting table columns Radek has added that Nucleus does not have, I was able to completely migrate my weblog to Nucleus.<br />
Also, the Nucleus plugin community is that active that I managed to include almost all of the features that Nucleus Core is lacking compared to Blog:CMS again with minimal effort and on top of that included some really helpful plugins that Blog:CMS lacks.</p>
<p>So my advice to all Blog:CMS users still left is indeed to migrate asap to Nucleus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JerryBrightonhammer</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-57109</link>
		<dc:creator>JerryBrightonhammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-57109</guid>
		<description>What in the name of Jerry Brightonhammer was that all about? 
I dont&#039; know but it doesn&#039;t make sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What in the name of Jerry Brightonhammer was that all about?<br />
I dont&#8217; know but it doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abhijit</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-5745</link>
		<dc:creator>abhijit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 04:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-5745</guid>
		<description>Hello friends!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello friends!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushubh</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>heh true. hail to the power of the wikipedia!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh true. hail to the power of the wikipedia!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Matt</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>The revert link is my friend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The revert link is my friend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushubh</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>radek wont let them stay there :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>radek wont let them stay there :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Matt</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-2382</guid>
		<description>It might please you to know that this page got a link in wikipedia on the nucleus / b:cms front.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might please you to know that this page got a link in wikipedia on the nucleus / b:cms front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admun</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>admun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>more fun on the episode: http://forum.nucleuscms.org/viewtopic.php?t=9347&amp;highlight=

Some translation of radak&#039;s writings.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more fun on the episode: <a href="http://forum.nucleuscms.org/viewtopic.php?t=9347&#038;highlight=" rel="nofollow">http://forum.nucleuscms.org/viewtopic.php?t=9347&#038;highlight=</a></p>
<p>Some translation of radak&#8217;s writings&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admun</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/76-blog-cms-and-wordpress#comment-2125</link>
		<dc:creator>admun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 14:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2004/08/17/blog-cms-and-wordpress/#comment-2125</guid>
		<description>You have not see nothing yet... http://forum.nucleuscms.org/viewtopic.php?t=9230</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have not see nothing yet&#8230; <a href="http://forum.nucleuscms.org/viewtopic.php?t=9230" rel="nofollow">http://forum.nucleuscms.org/viewtopic.php?t=9230</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
