<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not everyone happy with the new iGoogle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuff.techwhack.com/5521-new-igoogle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/5521-new-igoogle</link>
	<description>Software News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:12:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/5521-new-igoogle#comment-227721</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/?p=5521#comment-227721</guid>
		<description>Well, the change certainly ruined my home page. I&#039;ve since abandoned iGoogle and I&#039;m now coding my own portal. Thanks, Google, but no thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the change certainly ruined my home page. I&#8217;ve since abandoned iGoogle and I&#8217;m now coding my own portal. Thanks, Google, but no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DelSolid</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/5521-new-igoogle#comment-227603</link>
		<dc:creator>DelSolid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/?p=5521#comment-227603</guid>
		<description>My main complaint now is that Google violated the prime job of iGoogle. No, I&#039;m not talking about &quot;do no evil&quot;, I am talking about the &quot;i&quot;. &quot;i&quot; Google was supposed to my personal Google. It was supposed to be a home where a Google user can make his or her own personalized start page and home on the net. 
Sorry guys but: 
* i * don&#039;t want tabs. 
* i * want a clean, non-cluttered interface. 
* i * don&#039;t want chat 
* i * have no need for a canvas view 
* i * paid real money for all the screen real estate my monitor displays 
For a company to create a product called * i *Google and then start telling us what we are going to put on it and use it for is complete nonsense and frankly, quite arrogant. 
* i * now have a page at Netvibes.com and it does exactly what * i * want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main complaint now is that Google violated the prime job of iGoogle. No, I&#8217;m not talking about &#8220;do no evil&#8221;, I am talking about the &#8220;i&#8221;. &#8220;i&#8221; Google was supposed to my personal Google. It was supposed to be a home where a Google user can make his or her own personalized start page and home on the net.<br />
Sorry guys but:<br />
* i * don&#8217;t want tabs.<br />
* i * want a clean, non-cluttered interface.<br />
* i * don&#8217;t want chat<br />
* i * have no need for a canvas view<br />
* i * paid real money for all the screen real estate my monitor displays<br />
For a company to create a product called * i *Google and then start telling us what we are going to put on it and use it for is complete nonsense and frankly, quite arrogant.<br />
* i * now have a page at Netvibes.com and it does exactly what * i * want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Witch</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/5521-new-igoogle#comment-227594</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Witch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/?p=5521#comment-227594</guid>
		<description>Web design circa 1995 - Google has become Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web design circa 1995 &#8211; Google has become Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iGoogle nOmore</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/5521-new-igoogle#comment-227514</link>
		<dc:creator>iGoogle nOmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 02:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/?p=5521#comment-227514</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just the space taken up by the left-hand navigation bar, it&#039;s the inability to turn off previews in Gmail, the loss of nifty features like the ability to collapse or expand individual items in feeds, and the loss of formatting options in many modules. I&#039;m also told that themes stopped working, although those never did work correctly for me. It&#039;s also notable that with the introduction of paid &quot;Supermodules&quot; Google is now pushing certain companies on the iGoogle user, and this is bound to result in a more franchised and dumbed-down look and feel to the Google experience. One of the beautiful things about iGoogle has been the chaotic, energetic variety you can find if you want. How long before Google&#039;s new corporate clients come to dominate and push out that individualism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the space taken up by the left-hand navigation bar, it&#8217;s the inability to turn off previews in Gmail, the loss of nifty features like the ability to collapse or expand individual items in feeds, and the loss of formatting options in many modules. I&#8217;m also told that themes stopped working, although those never did work correctly for me. It&#8217;s also notable that with the introduction of paid &#8220;Supermodules&#8221; Google is now pushing certain companies on the iGoogle user, and this is bound to result in a more franchised and dumbed-down look and feel to the Google experience. One of the beautiful things about iGoogle has been the chaotic, energetic variety you can find if you want. How long before Google&#8217;s new corporate clients come to dominate and push out that individualism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
