<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Safari comes to Windows XP and Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuff.techwhack.com/1953-apple-safari-windows/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/1953-apple-safari-windows</link>
	<description>Software News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:12:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Mitnick</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/1953-apple-safari-windows#comment-74145</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mitnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2007/06/12/apple-safari-windows/#comment-74145</guid>
		<description>The whole thing is pointless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing is pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glacia</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/1953-apple-safari-windows#comment-73660</link>
		<dc:creator>Glacia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2007/06/12/apple-safari-windows/#comment-73660</guid>
		<description>They tested it on one computer and ran a total of three tests - only one of which seemed to be quite faster than opera. And considering it has even less features than Internet Explorer.

There needs to be more research and testing and less of the marketing spiel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They tested it on one computer and ran a total of three tests &#8211; only one of which seemed to be quite faster than opera. And considering it has even less features than Internet Explorer.</p>
<p>There needs to be more research and testing and less of the marketing spiel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
