<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reports: Apple might delay Leopard to ensure compatibility with Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuff.techwhack.com/1684-leopard-vista/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/1684-leopard-vista</link>
	<description>Software News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:12:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Miller</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/1684-leopard-vista#comment-56808</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2007/03/24/leopard/#comment-56808</guid>
		<description>However, Lotus Notes 7.0.2 is supported on Vista as the Lotus technote dated March 2 2007 states under #1252343.  Certification and full testing will fall for versions 7.0.3 and Notes 8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, Lotus Notes 7.0.2 is supported on Vista as the Lotus technote dated March 2 2007 states under #1252343.  Certification and full testing will fall for versions 7.0.3 and Notes 8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonyc</title>
		<link>http://stuff.techwhack.com/1684-leopard-vista#comment-56594</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuff.techwhack.com/archives/2007/03/24/leopard/#comment-56594</guid>
		<description>DigiTimes issued many rumors since Apple is back in mainstream medias, ut not one of them were true.

Apple says since 10 months that Leopard will be ready by spring 2007 and it will be.  Even if it were delayed, it wouldn&#039;t be Vista&#039;s fault because BootCamp is only a very small part on the new Mac OS X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DigiTimes issued many rumors since Apple is back in mainstream medias, ut not one of them were true.</p>
<p>Apple says since 10 months that Leopard will be ready by spring 2007 and it will be.  Even if it were delayed, it wouldn&#8217;t be Vista&#8217;s fault because BootCamp is only a very small part on the new Mac OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
