Why a browser makes sense for Google?
November 1st, 2004 Leave a comment Visited 499 times, 1 so far today
Why a browser makes sense for Google?
We speculated about it in May, the online world went crazy about a possibility as soon as they came to know about Google registering GBrowser.com. However, recent development indicates that Google is not really developing a browser from scratch. The official word seems to be “Google does not want to reinvent the wheelâ€.
Seems like a decent reason not to start a browser from scratch. We already have 3-4 browsing engines around. It is not a bad thing to have more choices, but the fact remains none of these engines are perfect. Internet Explorer being the most used (though arguably the least standard compliant) gets most of the attention from web developers. It also uses certain proprietary technologies, which leads to many websites not to work on alternate browsers. Firefox has come out as a breadth of fresh air and would see the first final release launch next week. It is free and its engine is very well developed and is improving by the day.
Now, there are rumors out about a possible collaboration between Google and Mozilla. It is all a speculation currently. However, considering the popularity of Google Search Engine, I believe a Google Browser made on Mozilla Gecko technology can be an excellent idea. Not because Google needs a browser to compete with Internet Explorer, but because people surfing the web can do with a better browser than Internet Explorer. No matter how much Microsoft claims that Internet Explorer is more secure than ever, it will continue to be attacked and with security hazard technologies like ActiveX built in you never can be sure about it. A Google Browser based on Mozilla Engine would let Google to spend more time enhancing its outer shell to be more user friendly and feature package without worrying about the rendering engine which would be developed by Mozilla Community. They can integrate their other services like GMail and Desktop Searching along with of course Google’s own search engine. Another advantage would be the fact that Google’s brand value in the market is much better than Mozilla. People new to internet would be tempted to download and test a Google branded browser.
Mozilla could benefit a lot with such kind of a mutual arrangement with Google with more support from developers and users. For general public, it would mean a better and a more secure browser to surf the internet. And for the developers it gives them the flexibility to use advance web technologies, which are both standard compliant and accessibility friendly. A win-win situation for everyone. Except for maybe Microsoft of course…
Today's Popular Posts
- SugarSync 1.5 released (10 views)
- The White House has a mobile app on the Apple App Store! (5 views)
- YouTube for Android updated with Google +1 button and some more features (3 views)
- Auto Resize JPEG is an excellent add-on for Mozilla Thunderbird (3 views)
- Windows XP SP3 users can’t uninstall Internet Explorer 7 (3 views)
- Twitter Tools: Backup your Twitter posts on a WordPress Blog! (3 views)
- Google confirms they are working on bringing video chat to Linux! (2 views)
- Facebook screen to register a device to use your account (2 views)
- Facebook launches Find Friends Browser! (2 views)
- Google launches the new look on Google Translate (2 views)
"Word is the best there is out there when it comes to word processing." -- um, no. WordPerfect is far better. It makes it much easier to manipulate formatting and styling -- probably because WordPerfect started as a desktop publishing program. Just try to design a flyer (or make a fancy resume) and you'll see the difference.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMicro$oft is threatening to invade Google's turf with a new search engine; it seems no more than poetic justice for Big G to return the compliment. Difference being that Google's service won't get launched until it's user-friendly, and it will be much quicker than anything M$ does. Not that that's difficult to achieve ...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJust how far would Google have to go to become a new MS? (Yeah, a long way still - but I am sure it would not mind trying.)
Unfortunately, as long as there are still people who are not entirely at ease with their computers we will see companies striving to provide one application to do everything instead of trying to excel at one nice task.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likebut as compared to Internet Explorer which is no longer good browser, Word is the best there is out there when it comes to word processing. And there are tons of good free word processors out there, but that can't be said about a web browser. :)
but maybe sometime, google would think about office applications. but for me, a browser makes more sense at the moment...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMicrosoft's power comes from leveraging all of its products against its ubiquitous OS. Google is king of search. Now each is treading into the other's domain. Microsoft has embarked upon a new push into search and Google created a desktop application. As features embedded within the browser can essentially direct a user to a preferred search engine and Mozilla is open-source, it makes all the sense in the world for Google to build its own brand of browser upon the Mozilla platform. But might not Google go further? How about a word processor integrated with the browser? MS with each update weaves its desktop applications ever tighter within its browser. What's the most popular MS desktop application? Word. If Google comes out with a viable replacements for both IE and Word, MS is deep trouble.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like